Sunday, January 1, 2012

Holder?s Voting Rights Gamble

Why did the Obama DoJ deny preclearance, knowing it could well set up this massive confrontation and potentially lead to the downfall of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act? There are both principled and political reasons. First of all, it was the right thing to do. As the DoJ letter explains, South Carolina presented no evidence that its law was necessary to prevent voter fraud, and the evidence was uncontested that minority voters were less likely to have ID Second, if the Court is going to strike down Section 5, it might be politically better for this to happen before the 2012 elections, so that Obama can run against a Supreme Court, and the possibility that a President Romney could appoint a young version of Justice Scalia to take a retiring Justice Kennedy?s seat on the court, solidifying the court?s conservative majority for a generation.

Source: http://feeds.slate.com/click.phdo?i=e8e7c6108d0e52d5c473f9170494e93b

nl mvp verlander verlander justin verlander pepper spraying cop pepper spraying cop somaya reece

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.